Optimal phosphate rate for lablab yield and marginal rate of return | Livestock and Fisheries Management (Livestock Feeds)

Many times scientists have considered maximum yields in developingfertilizer recommendation with no emphasis on the economics involved. However,it has been noted that the rate of fertilizer use, that results in the highestyield does not necessarily translate into the highest economic benefit to thefarmer. This therefore provided the basis for developing the optimal phosphaterate for maximum lablab seed yield and marginal rate of Read more..

Description of the technology or innovation

Many times scientists have considered maximum yields in developingfertilizer recommendation with no emphasis on the economics involved. However,it has been noted that the rate of fertilizer use, that results in the highestyield does not necessarily translate into the highest economic benefit to thefarmer. This therefore provided the basis for developing the optimal phosphaterate for maximum lablab seed yield and marginal rate of return as best betpractices. These management practices were used to develop a fertilizerapplication rate at which lablab seed yields are sufficient with a goodmarginal rate of return. This was intended to ensure that the farmers benefitfrom every shilling invested in lablab seed production.

 

Using these management practices, the highest seed yield of 1753kg ha-1 was obtained at 30 kg of P205 ha-1and was 40% higher than that of the control (1253 kg ha-1). Dominance analysisindicated that treatments of 80 kg ha-1 and 100 kg ha-1were dominated and their net benefits were estimated at Ushs 3,976,000 (approx.US$ 1,590.4) and Ushs 3,997,600 (approx. US$ 1,599) respectively, which werelower than Ushs 4,009,600 (approx. US$ 1,603.8) for the control. In Uganda,marginal analysis showed that the Marginal Rate of Return (MRR) from 0 to 15and 30 kgP2O5 was 500% and 700 % respectively. Raisingfertilizer application rate from 15 to 30 kgP2O5 resultedin a MRR of 274 %. Also the MRR for treatment of 15 and 30 kgP205ha-1 were higher than the minimum acceptable rate of return (50%) by farmers.The study concluded that the rate of 30 kg P2O5ha-1was the most economically viable for seed production in Uganda. This impliesthat for every shilling invested in fertilizer application, farmers can expectto recover 1.00 Ushs in addition to Ushs. 274.


Assessment/reflection on utilization, dissemination & scaling out or up approaches used

The primary target groupfor this management practice are the livestock farmers and scientists. Despiteits importance in seed production, the appropriate P regimes for optimumproduction of lablab seed have not been emphasized. However, the recommended Pregime should also make economic sense to farmers whose major objective is togenerate income. Studies on yield responses to various fertilizer regimesusually focus on fertilizer treatments that lead to the highest responses inyields with little emphasis on the net benefits associated with suchtreatments. Such studies may be misleading for farmers since increase in yieldsdoes not necessarily lead to increase in incomes (net benefits) as highinvestment may be needed to achieve additional yield.

Current situation and future scaling up

This best practice provides useful information on economicallyoptimal phosphate rate for lablab yields, as well as application rate with thehighest marginal rate of return. The technology is intended to benefit allcommunity members, but lends itself significantly to the context of womenfarmers, who constitute majority of small scale livestock farmers. Arguably,the management may be rendered less accurate in the context of changingclimatic conditions/regimes, where optimal phosphate rate may change withchange in rainfall patterns. Increased lablab yield is expected to result intoincreased milk yields and hence improved nutrition, incomes and foodsecurity. 


Economic Considerations

The practice enables efficient utilization of farm resources, inthis case fertilizers which may not be affordable for some farmers. The practicealso enhances efficiency and reduces wastage, which translates into reducingcost of farm operations and increasing net benefits. 

Gender considerations

The TIMP is gender-neutral and isintended to benefit all members of the community, including vulnerable andmarginalized groups. The strategy particularly addresses the context andsituation of women farmers, who constitute a majority of small-scale livestockfarmers.

Contact details

Mugerwa Swidiq;

Lead Scientist, National Livestock Resources Research Institute(NaLIRRI);

P. O. Box 96;

Tororo, Uganda.

Tel: +256 45448360

Mob: +256-782660295

Email: swidiqk@yahoo.com

 

Njarui Donald;

Scientist, Kenya Agricultural Livestock and Research Organization–Katumani;

P. O. Box 340 -90100;

Machakos, Kenya.

Tel: +254-44-20495; +254-44-20395

Mob: +254-726345712

Fax: +254-44-21122

Email: donaldnjarui@yahoo.com

 

Sara, Abd Elraheem;

Scientist, Agricultural Research Corporation (ARC);

P. O. Box 126;

Wad Medani, Sudan.

Tel: +249-511-842226/+249-511-843890 (C/o)

Mob: +249-918-315708

Email: saraae2004@yahoo.com

 

Nijimbere, A;

Scientist, Mahwa Research Centre, ISABU;

P.O. Box 795;

Bujumbura, Burundi.

Mob: +257-79625120

Email: aloysndos@yahoo.fr 

 


Additional information

This management practice must be used in combination with other goodagronomic management practices such as timely planting, water and soilconservation as well as timely disease and pest control. Therefore, the role ofextension must be highly emphasized for maximum benefits.


Glossary

Mugerwa, S., Njarui, D., Sara, A.E. B. and Nijimbere, A. 2012. Acomparative analysis of the effect of phosphate fertilizers on lablab seedproduction. NARO and ASARECA (in press).

 

Yemane, A. and Skjelvag, A.O. 2003. Effects of FertilizerPhosphorus on Yield Traits of Dekoko (Pisum sativum var. abyssinicum) UnderField Conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189: 14-20.


comments powered by Disqus